Xref: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu talk.politics.guns:55485 soc.culture.usa:14195 alt.rush-limbaugh:24311 talk.politics.misc:180106
Newsgroups: talk.politics.guns,soc.culture.usa,alt.rush-limbaugh,talk.politics.misc,tx.politics
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!magnesium.club.cc.cmu.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mnemosyne.cs.du.edu!VM.TEMPLE.EDU!V2110A
From: V2110A@VM.TEMPLE.EDU (Richard Hoenes)
Subject: Re: ATF BURNS DIVIDIAN RANCH! NO SURVIVORS!!!
Message-ID: <16BBDB69A.V2110A@VM.TEMPLE.EDU>
Sender: usenet@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu (netnews admin account)
Organization: Temple University
X-Newsreader: NNR/VM S_1.3.2
References: <dusek.735856284@shale> <1993Apr27.071223.3508@uoft02.utoledo.edu>,<C65E95.D7u@news.cso.uiuc.edu> <1993Apr27.154255.18227@synapse.bms.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 93 12:59:04 EDT
Lines: 29

In article <1993Apr27.154255.18227@synapse.bms.com>
hambidge@bms.com writes:
 
>
>In article <C65E95.D7u@news.cso.uiuc.edu>, irvine@uxh.cso.uiuc.edu (Brent Irvine) writes:
>>In article <1993Apr27.071223.3508@uoft02.utoledo.edu> steiner@jupiter.cse.utoledo.edu (Jason 'Think!' Steiner) writes:
>>>James P. Dusek (dusek@rtsg.mot.com) writes:
>>>> garrod@dynamo.ecn.purdue.edu (David Garrod) writes:
>>>
>>>>     They did, they used CS that would NOT harm children.
>>>
>>>i REALLY hope you're being sarcastic here, but i've seen so many
>>>stupid things said in complete seriousness that it's hard to tell
>>>without a smiley.
>>>
>>>do you actually believe there's a CS gas that can discriminate based
>>>on the age of the target?
>>
>>Yes, the gas used was a mild concentration or formulation compared to
>>the 'heavy duty' stuff.
>
>You know this for a fact? How do you know? Or, are you just making
>things up for flamebait?
>
The FBI has claimed from the begining that it wasn't standard use
tear gas. How do you know it was? Or do you just assume it was
for flamebait?
 
Richard
