Xref: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu talk.politics.guns:54624 soc.culture.usa:13853
Newsgroups: talk.politics.guns,soc.culture.usa
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!magnesium.club.cc.cmu.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!fs7.ece.cmu.edu!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!howland.reston.ans.net!newsserver.jvnc.net!synapse.bms.com!bms.comt!HAMBIDGE
From: hambidge@bms.com
Subject: Re: ATF BURNS DIVIDIAN RANCH! NO SURVIVORS!!!
Message-ID: <1993Apr23.194834.24072@synapse.bms.com>
Sender: news@synapse.bms.com
Reply-To: hambidge@bms.com
Organization: Bristol-Myers Squibb
References: <C5sv88.HJy@news.cso.uiuc.edu> <93112.153005MGB@SLACVM.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU>,<23APR199314304189@rigel.tamu.edu>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 1993 19:48:34 GMT
Lines: 18

In article <23APR199314304189@rigel.tamu.edu>, mst4298@rigel.tamu.edu (Mitchell S Todd) writes:
>
>	If there was a large propane tank, and it was breached, don't 
>	you think that there would be an identifiable explosion?

From what I saw of the videotape, there was an explosion which looked
more like one due to propane rather than (official version)
ammunition.

>	The only evidence that exists right now (at least what we know
>	about) is various claims and counter claims. I'm waiting until
>	the hard evidence is released. What about you?

If only we could be certain that the hard evidence will be released.

Al
[standard disclaimer]

