Xref: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu sci.crypt:15387 alt.security:10002 comp.org.eff.talk:16954 comp.security.misc:3440 comp.org.acm:1641
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news.harvard.edu!spdcc!merk!tacobel!stan
From: stan@tacobel.UUCP (stan)
Newsgroups: sci.crypt,alt.security,comp.org.eff.talk,comp.security.misc,comp.org.acm,comp.or
Subject: Re: text of White House announcement and Q&As on clipper chip encryp
Message-ID: <X9D92B4w165w@tacobel.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 93 22:03:44 EDT
References: <1993Apr17.032022.14021@clarinet.com>
Organization: The Temple of Stan - TBS World HQ - Concord, Mass, USA

brad@clarinet.com (Brad Templeton) writes:
> Let's assume, for the moment, that the system really is secure unless
> you get both halves of the encryption key from the two independent
> escrow houses.  Let's say you even trust the escrow houses -- one is
> the ACLU and the other is the EFF.  (And I'm not entirely joking about
> those two names)
> 
Hi, I'm new to Internet, so this is a bit of a test message, so even a 
token reply would be very appreciated.

Anyways, reading this I'd figure this would be as excellent a method of 
corrupting the ACLU and the EFF as could be wished for.  "Who Gaurds the 
Guardians?", etc...
