Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!magnesium.club.cc.cmu.edu!pitt.edu!uunet!mcsun!uknet!edcastle!dcs.ed.ac.uk!pdc
From: pdc@dcs.ed.ac.uk (Paul Crowley)
Newsgroups: sci.crypt
Subject: Re: Organized Lobbying for Cryptography
Message-ID: <C691Fo.CpF@dcs.ed.ac.uk>
Date: 29 Apr 93 14:26:12 GMT
References: <1993Apr28.153640.17413@tessi.com> <1rn1b3$khb@news.intercon.com>
Sender: cnews@dcs.ed.ac.uk (UseNet News Admin)
Reply-To: pdc@dcs.ed.ac.uk (Paul Crowley)
Organization: Edinburgh University
Lines: 10

Quoting amanda@intercon.com (Amanda Walker) in article <1rn1b3$khb@news.intercon.com>:
>george@tessi.com (George Mitchell) writes:
>> Guns are offensive.  Cryptography is defensive.  See the difference? 

>Nope.  Information, properly delivered, can be just as deadly as lead.

The same is true of lemon meringue pie.
  __                                  _____
\/ o\ Paul Crowley   pdc@dcs.ed.ac.uk \\ //
/\__/ Trust me. I know what I'm doing. \X/  Fold a fish for Jesus!
