Xref: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu alt.conspiracy:21413 soc.culture.arabic:17897 soc.culture.jewish:62273 soc.culture.pakistan:37223 talk.politics.mideast:75423 talk.politics.misc:177014
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news.harvard.edu!ogicse!uwm.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!uvaarpa!maxwell!jac2y
From: jac2y@Virginia.EDU ("Jonathan A. Cook <jac2y>")
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,soc.culture.arabic,soc.culture.jewish,soc.culture.pakistan,talk.politics.mideast,talk.politics.misc
Subject: Re: FLASH    - SALAMEH not ARAB!
Message-ID: <1993Apr6.223159.5401@Virginia.EDU>
Date: 6 Apr 93 22:31:59 GMT
Article-I.D.: Virginia.1993Apr6.223159.5401
References: <1993Apr06.131906.6803@ncrcae.ColumbiaSC.NCR.COM>
Organization: University of Virginia
Lines: 17

nabil@ncrcol.ColumbiaSC.NCR.COM  writes:
> >Fine, land for peace.  Where does that leave us?  Note that
> >maybe, theoretically, Morocco can be my 'father's land.' Does that
> >give me the right to pre-empt King Hassan automatically?
> > 
>  
> It leaves us with peace. If Morocco is your father's land then you
> have the right to live there, absolutely.

I have the right to live there UNDER the established
government, right?  Exactly.  Thus, the Palestinian Arabs
should be content to live under Israeli rule, but should cease
clamoring for an independent state.  OR, they should get one in
Gaza and, if it can be worked out, part of the West Bank.  This
is what I have proposed all along, Nabil.

Jon, jac2y@virginia.edu
