Newsgroups: talk.politics.mideast
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!magnesium.club.cc.cmu.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!dog.ee.lbl.gov!pasteur!bellini.berkeley.edu!adams
From: adams@bellini.berkeley.edu (Adam L. Schwartz)
Subject: Re: Israel's Expansion II
Message-ID: <1993Apr27.165751.12899@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU>
Sender: nntp@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU (NNTP Poster)
Nntp-Posting-Host: bellini.berkeley.edu
Organization: U.C. Berkeley -- ERL
References: <1ri5pk$2f0@cat.cis.Brown.EDU>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 1993 16:57:51 GMT
Lines: 27

In article <1ri5pk$2f0@cat.cis.Brown.EDU> dzk@cs.brown.edu (Danny Keren) writes:
>Can someone elaborate a little on what this "Libertarian" movement is? I
>am not going to draw conclusions from a small sample, but so far I
>recall two self-described "Libertarians" posting here. Both seems to be:
>
>1) Incredibly ignorant.
>2) Incredibly arrogant.
>3) All they want is to get people angry.
>4) Posses a lousy sense of humor.
>5) write incoherently and jump from topic to topic without any logical
>   connection between topics.
>6) Describe themselves as intelligent and knowledgeable, although everything
>   in their posters points to the opposite.
>7) Very childish.
>
>Is this some campaign to smear this Libertarian party or what?


Wow, hang on a second.  The libertarian party stands for personal freedom,
lassez-faire economics and minimal government.  Whoever is describing the
self as a Libertarian (maybe you were refering to the posters who call 
themselves civil libertarians) are not talking at all about Libertarian
philosophy.

-Adam Schwartz
(libertarian)

