Xref: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu sci.crypt:15662 alt.security:10066 comp.org.eff.talk:17074 comp.security.misc:3518 comp.org.acm:1684 comp.org.ieee:1612
Newsgroups: sci.crypt,alt.security,comp.org.eff.talk,comp.security.misc,comp.org.acm,comp.org.ieee
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!crabapple.srv.cs.cmu.edu!bb3.andrew.cmu.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!haven.umd.edu!uunet!lehman.com!snark!pmetzger
From: pmetzger@snark.shearson.com (Perry E. Metzger)
Subject: Re: Once tapped, your code is no good any more.
Message-ID: <1993Apr21.172614.10185@lehman.com>
Sender: news@lehman.com (News)
Organization: Partnership for an America Free Drug
References: <Apr18.194927.17048@yuma.ACNS.ColoState.EDU> <pgf.735187697@srl03.cacs.usl.edu> <1993Apr20.034724.3748@colnet.cmhnet.org>
Distribution: na
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 1993 17:26:14 GMT
Lines: 14

res@colnet.cmhnet.org (Rob Stampfli) writes:
>
>Wouldn't a a second monitor of similar type scrolling gibberish and adjacent
>to the one being used provide reasonable resistance to tempest attacks?

It would be in a different location, so a directional antenna could
probably lock in on just the one monitor. Failing that, a phased array
could likely seperate the signals. Admittedly, this is expensive, but
so is all the rest of this stuff anyway.

--
Perry Metzger		pmetzger@shearson.com
--
Laissez faire, laissez passer. Le monde va de lui meme.
