Newsgroups: talk.politics.guns
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!magnesium.club.cc.cmu.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!newsserver.jvnc.net!synapse.bms.com!bms.comt!HAMBIDGE
From: hambidge@bms.com
Subject: Re: Blast them next time
Message-ID: <1993Apr20.170453.10298@synapse.bms.com>
Sender: news@synapse.bms.com
Reply-To: hambidge@bms.com
Organization: Bristol-Myers Squibb
References: <1r19l9$7dv@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu>
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1993 17:04:53 GMT
Lines: 31

In article <1r19l9$7dv@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu>, oldham@ces.cwru.edu (Daniel Oldham) writes:
>What happened in Waco is not the fault of the BATF. If they would of
>had the proper equipment and personal then they could of captured the
>compound on the initial assault and none of this would of happened.
>
>The BATF needs more people, better weapons and more armored
>transports. When they meet hostile fire they should be able to use
>more force instead of retreating to a stand off. If you are going to
>do a job then do it right. The BATF is there to protect us and they
>must have the proper equipment and people to do the job.
>
>With the WoD and the increased crime in the streets the BATF is needed
>more now then ever. If they blast away a few good fokes then that is
>the price we all have to pay for law and order in this country. Look
>at all the good people that died in wars to protect this great country
>of ours.
>
>With the arms build up in Waco they needed to hit that compound with
>mega fire power. They could of gone in there blasting and killed a few
>women and kids but it would of been better then letting them all burn
>to death 51 days later.
>

Did you forget to put in a sarcasm flag?

Al
[standard disclaimer]




