Newsgroups: rec.autos
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!rochester!udel!gatech!howland.reston.ans.net!news.ans.net!newsgate.watson.ibm.com!yktnews.watson.ibm.com!sultan!alter
From: alter@rchland.vnet.ibm.com (Eric Alter)
Subject: Re: The 1994 Mustang
Sender: news@rchland.ibm.com
Message-ID: <1993Apr23.183049.19025@rchland.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 1993 18:30:49 GMT
Reply-To: alter@rchland.vnet.ibm.com
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not necessarily those of IBM
References: <1993Apr22.192652.3032@virginia.edu> <C5xtp7.MtB@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
Nntp-Posting-Host: sultan.rchland.ibm.com
Organization: IBM Rochester Mn
Lines: 30

In article <C5xtp7.MtB@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>, jmh@hopper.Virginia.EDU (Jeffrey Hoffmeister) writes:
|> In article <1993Apr22.192652.3032@virginia.edu> jmm4h@Virginia.EDU ("The Blade Runner") writes:
|> >I just have got to remind all of you that this is it!  Yes,
|> >that's right, somtime this fall, Ford (the granddaddy of cars)
|> >will be introducing an all-new, mega-cool
|> >way-too-fast-for-Accord-drivers Mustang.  It's supposed to be
|> >100% streamlined, looking similar to the Mach III concept car
|> >Ford came out with around January.  I can't wait.  Anyone out
|> >there hear anything about it recently?
|> 
|> 
|> If everything I've read is correct, Ford is doing nothing but "re-
|> skinning" the existing Mustang, with MINOR suspension modifications.
|> And the pictures I've seen indicate they didn't do a very good job
|> of it.  
|> 
|> The "new" mustang, is nothing but a re-cycle of a 20 year old car.
|> 
|> Jeff
|> 
|> 
|> 


What???  I heard there was a new engine slated for the mustang...something
like 280hp  (ok, it was from one of their other lines...)...

-- 

Eric Alter
