Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!crabapple.srv.cs.cmu.edu!bb3.andrew.cmu.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!uchinews!att-out!att!att!drutx!druwa!dlo
From: dlo@druwa.ATT.COM (OlsonDL)
Newsgroups: talk.politics.guns
Subject: Re: Ban All Firearms !
Message-ID: <24477@drutx.ATT.COM>
Date: 15 Apr 93 14:16:21 GMT
References: <C5D42C.88K@undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca> <1qc5sa$obl@pandora.sdsu.edu>
Sender: news@drutx.ATT.COM
Lines: 16

In article <1qc5sa$obl@pandora.sdsu.edu>, chiu@io.nosc.mil (Francis Chiu) writes:
}     A note on the lighter side, I've noticed most gun-banners (some of my
}   friends included) are the one who make comments that indicate they are 
}   more likely to resort to violent.  So are they really banning guns so they 
}   wouldn't end up shooting someone else?

Could be.

It is also likely that since they feel they are more likely to resort to
violence, they have a hard time believing that anyone else would react
otherwise.
--
David Olson            dlo@drutx.att.com
"Well, I did say we'll put it out and we'll put it out when we can.
 But I don't know what we can put out or when we can put it out."
 -- George Stephanopolous.
