Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!magnesium.club.cc.cmu.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!news.service.uci.edu!beckman.com!dsg4.dse.beckman.com!a_rubin
Newsgroups: sci.crypt
Subject: Re: Key Registering Bodies
Message-ID: <a_rubin.735498087@dsg4.dse.beckman.com>
From: a_rubin@dsg4.dse.beckman.com (Arthur Rubin)
Date: 22 Apr 93 17:01:27 GMT
References: <930419182442.669507@DOCKMASTER.NCSC.MIL> <nagleC5w79E.7HL@netcom.com>
Organization: Beckman Instruments, Inc.
Nntp-Posting-Host: dsg4.dse.beckman.com
Lines: 16

In <nagleC5w79E.7HL@netcom.com> nagle@netcom.com (John Nagle) writes:

>       Since the law requires that wiretaps be requested by the Executive
>Branch and approved by the Judicial Branch, it seems clear that one
>of the key registering bodies should be under the control of the
>Judicial Branch.  I suggest the Supreme Court, or, regionally, the
>Courts of Appeal.  More specifically, the offices of their Clerks.

Now THAT makes sense.  But the other half must be in a non-government
escrow.  (I still like EFF, but I admin their security has not been
tested.)

--
Arthur L. Rubin: a_rubin@dsg4.dse.beckman.com (work) Beckman Instruments/Brea
216-5888@mcimail.com 70707.453@compuserve.com arthur@pnet01.cts.com (personal)
My opinions are my own, and do not represent those of my employer.
