Xref: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu soc.religion.christian:21544
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news.harvard.edu!noc.near.net!howland.reston.ans.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!rutgers!igor.rutgers.edu!geneva.rutgers.edu!christian
From: sfp@lemur.cit.cornell.edu (Sheila Patterson)
Newsgroups: soc.religion.christian
Subject: Re: Mary's assumption
Message-ID: <May.13.02.28.21.1993.1452@geneva.rutgers.edu>
Date: 13 May 93 06:28:22 GMT
Sender: hedrick@geneva.rutgers.edu
Organization: Cornell University CIT
Lines: 22
Approved: christian@aramis.rutgers.edu

In article <May.11.02.37.01.1993.28111@athos.rutgers.edu>, mpaul@unl.edu (marxhausen paul) writes:|> feeling that "the assumption of Mary" would be better phrased "our

[text deleted] 
|> I also don't see the _necessity_ of saying the Holy Parents were some-
|> how sanctified beyond normal humanity: it sounds like our own inability
|> to grasp the immensity of God's grace in being incarnated through an or-
|> dinary human being.  
|> 
[text deleted]
|> --
|> paul marxhausen 

Thank you very much Paul.  I have always been impressed by the very human-ness of
Mary.  That God chose a woman, like me, to bring into this world the incarnation
of Himself proves to me that this God is MY God. He reaches down from His
perfection to touch me. Ah, the wonder of it all :-)

-- 
  Sheila Patterson, CIT CR-Technical Support Group
  315 CCC - Cornell University
  Ithaca, NY  14853
  (607) 255-5388
