Newsgroups: comp.graphics
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news.harvard.edu!noc.near.net!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!linac!uchinews!quads!dgf1
From: dgf1@quads.uchicago.edu (Dr. Eldon Tyrell)
Subject: Re: So what is the fastest Windows video c
Message-ID: <1993Apr18.171726.18043@midway.uchicago.edu>
Sender: news@uchinews.uchicago.edu (News System)
Reply-To: dgf1@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: University of Chicago
References: <16APR199309101156@trentu.ca> <1993Apr17.054600.24917@exu.ericsson.se>
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 1993 17:17:26 GMT
Lines: 21

In article <1993Apr17.054600.24917@exu.ericsson.se> ebuhcb@ebu.ericsson.se writes:
>In article 16APR199309101156@trentu.ca, ayounes@trentu.ca (Amro Younes, Trent University, C.C. #314, Peterborough, ON, Canada K9J 7B8. (705) 749-0391) writes:
>>I have the ATI GRAPHICS ULTRA PRO EISA version.  I must admit it has 
>>received bad press but that was due to the faulty drivers it had.  
>
>PC Magazine seems to be impressed with the ATI card in their most recent
>reviews.  In the April 13th issue they rate the ATI Graphics Ultra Pro
>(EISA version) as their "Editor's Choice".  They noted that the drivers
>had improved since they tested the ISA version in January...
>                                                            ...Cuyler
Yeah - they also gave it their "Editor's Choice" in the run-down of
graphics accelerators they tested in the previous issue, which is why
I bought (and then returned) mine.  The only conclusion I can come up with
is that PC Magazine has wildly different ways on determining the worthiness
of a video card than I do.

-- 
David Farley                           The University of Chicago Library
312 702-3426                              1100 East 57th Street, JRL-210
dgf1@midway.uchicago.edu                         Chicago, Illinois 60637

