Xref: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu soc.religion.christian:21606
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news.harvard.edu!noc.near.net!howland.reston.ans.net!darwin.sura.net!sgiblab!sgigate!rutgers!igor.rutgers.edu!athos.rutgers.edu!christian
From: db7n+@andrew.cmu.edu (D. Andrew Byler)
Newsgroups: soc.religion.christian
Subject: Re: The doctrine of Original Sin
Message-ID: <May.14.02.11.33.1993.25216@athos.rutgers.edu>
Date: 14 May 93 06:11:34 GMT
Sender: hedrick@athos.rutgers.edu
Organization: Freshman, Civil Engineering, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Lines: 16
Approved: christian@aramis.rutgers.edu

Eugen Bigelow writes:

>It is also noteworthy to consider Jesus' attitude. He had no
>argument with the pharisees over any of the OT canon (John
>10.31-6), and explained to his followers on the road to Emmaus 
>that in the law, prophets and psalms which referred to him - the 
>OT division of Scripture (Luke 24.44), as well as in Luke 11.51
>taking Genesis to Chronicles (the jewish order - we would say
>Genesis to Malachi) as Scripture.

You should remember that in Adam's transgression, all men and women
sinned, as Paul wrote.  All of humanity cooperativley reblled against
God in Adma's sin, thus, all are subject to it, and the sin is
transmitted from generation to generation.

Andy Byler
