Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!rochester!udel!gatech!howland.reston.ans.net!noc.near.net!uunet!auspex-gw!news
From: tpickett@auspex.com (Tom Pickett)
Newsgroups: rec.autos
Subject: Re: SHO and SC
Message-ID: <17590@auspex-gw.auspex.com>
Date: 20 Apr 93 21:18:17 GMT
References: <1qehi6$ork@armory.centerline.com>
Sender: news@auspex-gw.auspex.com
Reply-To: tpickett@auspex.com (Tom Pickett)
Organization: Auspex Systems, Inc.  Engineering
Lines: 20
Nntp-Posting-Host: 144.48.14.46

In article <1qehi6$ork@armory.centerline.com>, jimf@centerline.com (Jim 
Frost) writes:
> Ok, I'll give you a few reasons:
> 
> 1. Neither car was designed to turn at those speeds.
> 2. Neither car was designed to stop quickly from those speeds.
> 3. Safety mechanisms were not designed for impacts at those speeds.
> 4. An uncontrolled environment leads to unpredictable circumstances
>    where you might need to turn or stop with no notice.


Do you, by any chance own an SHO or have access to one, such that you
would have any idea what it is designed for or how it handles?

Just wondering...


Tom Pickett 
tpickett@auspex.com or 74616.2237@compuserve.com
SHO  GOZE
