Xref: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu comp.bbs.waffle:8907 comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware:60572
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news.harvard.edu!noc.near.net!howland.reston.ans.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!destroyer!cs.ubc.ca!unixg.ubc.ca!kakwa.ucs.ualberta.ca!ersys!alpha3!news
From: russell@alpha3.ersys.edmonton.ab.ca (Russell Schulz)
Newsgroups: comp.bbs.waffle,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Re: 16550 UARTs (was: uucico for windows)
Message-ID: <930419.081310.4u8.rusnews.w164w@alpha3.ersys.edmonton.ab.ca>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1993 08:13:10 MDT
References: <930412.062217.4M9.rusnews.w165w@sendai.cybrspc.mn.org> <miP62B1w165w@west.darkside.com>
Reply-To: russell@alpha3.ersys.edmonton.ab.ca (Russell Schulz)
Followup-To: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Organization: Private System, Edmonton, AB, Canada
X-Newsreader: rusnews v1.03
Lines: 14

turtle@west.darkside.com (Fred Waller) writes:

>> 16550s are _not_ stupid!  
> 
>   Actually, they are, in the sense that hardware solutions to 
>   a software problem are not proper.  A programmer's function 

[much deleted]

amazing.  I could not find _one_ reference to waffle in all of this.

followups redirected out.
-- 
Russell Schulz  russell@alpha3.ersys.edmonton.ab.ca  ersys!rschulz  Shad 86c
