Xref: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu comp.graphics:38809 sci.image.processing:2756
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!magnesium.club.cc.cmu.edu!pitt.edu!gatech!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!ames!sun-barr!sh.wide!wnoc-tyo-news!cs.titech!sys.titech.ac.jp!pi.titech!pisun!malek
From: malek@pi.titech.ac.jp (Zidouri Abdelmalek 03/95)
Newsgroups: comp.graphics,sci.image.processing
Subject: Re: TIFF: philosophical significance of 42
Message-ID: <MALEK.93Apr27203916@mimosa.pi.titech.ac.jp>
Date: 27 Apr 93 11:39:16 GMT
References: <1r0ms5$k65@ratatosk.uninett.no> <C5trKF.Az@brunel.ac.uk>
Sender: news@pi.titech.ac.jp (News Administrator)
Organization: Tokyo Institute of Tech., Precision and Intelligence Lab., Japan
Lines: 23
In-Reply-To: se92psh@brunel.ac.uk's message of Wed, 21 Apr 1993 08:29:03 GMT

>>>>> On Wed, 21 Apr 1993 08:29:03 GMT, se92psh@brunel.ac.uk (Peter Hauke) said:

Peter> joachim lous (joachim@kih.no) wrote:

Peter> : > Does anyone have any  other suggestions where the 42 came from?

Peter> Yep, here's a theory that I once heard bandied around.  Rather than thinking
Peter> of the number think of the sound. For Tea Two. A sort of anagram on Tea For Two,
Peter> Two for Tea, For Tea Two.
                    ~~~~~~~~~~~ 
Un other suggestion is there is no Tea above! It just 
And For Two many things are possible; think binary, + -, Y/N,
L/R, T/F  No wonder there was Eve for Adam! 

Peter> :-)
 
Malek :-) :-)

--
 Malek.
 
 "We cooperate in what we agree on, and forgive each other for that
  in which we disagree." Hassan El Banna.
