Xref: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu comp.org.eff.talk:17061 alt.privacy.clipper:39 sci.crypt:15633
Newsgroups: comp.org.eff.talk,alt.privacy.clipper,sci.crypt
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!crabapple.srv.cs.cmu.edu!bb3.andrew.cmu.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!bogus.sura.net!news-feed-1.peachnet.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!sfsuvax1.sfsu.edu!sphughes
From: sphughes@sfsuvax1.sfsu.edu (Shaun P. Hughes)
Subject: Re: Organized Lobbying for Cryptography
Message-ID: <1993Apr21.154122.13015@csus.edu>
Sender: news@csus.edu
Organization: San Francisco State University
References: <1r2gb5$h0r@transfer.stratus.com> <1r3jgbINN35i@eli.CS.YALE.EDU>
Distribution: inet
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 1993 15:41:22 GMT
Lines: 27

In article <1r3jgbINN35i@eli.CS.YALE.EDU> jgfoot@minerva.cis.yale.edu writes:
>Tarl Neustaedter (tarl@coyoacan.sw.stratus.com) wrote:
>
>: It means that the EFF's public stance is complicated with issues irrelevant
>: to the encryption issue per se. There may well be people who care about
>: the encryption issue who don't care to associate themselves with the
>: network erotica issue (or may even disagree with the EFF's position).
>
>Perhaps these encryption-only types would defend the digitized porn if it
>was posted encrypted?
>
>These issues are not as seperable as you maintain.
>

Now why would anyone "post" anything encrypted? Encryption is only of 
use between persons who know how to decrypt the data.

And why should I care what other people look at? 

What does concern me is the continued erosion of my constitutional
rights. ( Amendments I, II, IV, and V to note a few. )

-- 
  Shaun P. Hughes                          "Facts are Stupid Things."
  sphughes@sfsuvax1.sfsu.edu                Ronald Reagan
                                            Republican National
  Finger for PGP 2.2 Public Key             Convention 1988
