Newsgroups: talk.politics.guns
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!crabapple.srv.cs.cmu.edu!fs7.ece.cmu.edu!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!gatech!howland.reston.ans.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wupost!csus.edu!netcom.com!donb
From: donb@netcom.com (Don Baldwin)
Subject: Re: 2ND AMENDMENT DEAD - GOOD !
Message-ID: <donbC5osww.3tD@netcom.com>
Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest)
References: <1993Apr18.001319.2340@gnv.ifas.ufl.edu>
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 1993 16:10:08 GMT
Lines: 29

In article <1993Apr18.001319.2340@gnv.ifas.ufl.edu> jrm@gnv.ifas.ufl.edu 
writes:
>The bulk of firarems are used against unworthy and unnesessary
>opponents ... those who posessa a cool jakcet you want, those who
>would argue with you about a parking space, those who would
>take your woman. In short, trivial and worthless causes.

That's open for debate.  Certainly, an excessive number of people are
murdered every year but people also do save innocent lives with firearms.
The media just don't tell us when it happens...

>Too much of this has ruined you cause. There is no recovery. 
>In the near future, federal martials will come for your arms.

I think there are more of us than there are federal marshalls...

>No one will help you. You are more dangerous, to their thinking,
>than the 'criminal'. This is your own fault. 

Crap.  It's simplistic thinking on the part of feather-headed dolts.

>The 2nd amendment is dead. Accept this. Find another way.

Nuts.

    don



